Skip to content

Fired for Being Pregnant: Does the Employer Want the Woman to Have An Abortion?

May 22, 2012

The EEOC allowed two women to move forward with a lawsuit claiming that they were fired for being pregnant.  In one transcript of a conversation, the woman who fired the pregnant mother states that since her “situation” still existed (is a pregnancy a situation?) the mother couldn’t be rehired.  It sounds an awful lot like an employer-requested abortion to me, but see what you think:

Two former Fulton County 911 operator trainees plan to sue the Georgia county, claiming they were fired for being pregnant.

One of the women secretly recorded a conversation she said she had with the director of the Emergency Communications Center, during which she asked for her job back after being fired.

In the recording obtained by ABC News, a person identified as department director Angela Barrett repeatedly refers to Que’ana Morris’ “situation” as the reason for her firing.

“I understand you have a situation. All I’m doing is giving you time to rectify your situation, and then you can come back when you can come to work,” Barrett tells Morris on the tape.

Morris says in the two months before she was fired, she missed 16 days of work on doctor’s orders over complications with her pregnancy. She says she had permission to miss those days for medical reasons, and that it only became a problem after she was already fired.

“I don’t have that option to turn around and rehire you when you haven’t eliminated the situation that’s causing your absence,” Barrett says in the recording. “According to you, you’re absent because of the pregnancy. So, how am I supposed to be able to make a decision when the condition still exists?”

VIDEO: Ex-911 operator trainees in Georgia release recordings between their director.

Barrett never specifies what she means by “rectify,” but Morris told ABC affiliate WSB-TV it was clear to her that the “situation” was her pregnancy and that she couldn’t continue working as long as she was still pregnant.

“I was devastated because all of my reviews were satisfactory. Nothing stated I was a bad employee,” Morris said.

Morris filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on the ground that she was discriminated against because of her gender, due to her pregnancy. The EEOC investigation found in her favor, and concluded she had the right to sue her former employer.

Morris and Leeneeka Bell, who says she was fired by the Emergency Communications Center after her pregnancy left her on bed rest, announced their plans to file a lawsuit after the EEOC finding. Their attorney, Lisa Millican, says this is a clear-cut case of discrimination.


Enhanced by Zemanta
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: