Pedophiles or Principals at Texas Middle Schools?
Controversy has erupted in Texas after male “professionals” “paddled” their young students behind closed doors, leaving bruises and welts? Are these principals or pedophiles? Well, in the rest of the country, we would qualify the principals or vice-principals who bruise the genital areas of their young charges in their offices alone with young children as pedophiles, but apparently Texas calls them principals, and school officials are looking to make pedophilia-laced behaviors easier to promulgate in Texas:
Taylor Santos, a well-regarded student and athlete at Springtown High School, near Fort Worth, Texas, chose to be paddled as punishment for allowing another student to copy her homework. She opted for the paddling over a second day of suspension after having already served one day of a two-day suspension.
Her mother, Anna Jorgensen, agreed to the punishment as long as her daughter was OK with it, but was surprised the spanking was administered by a man, she told local ABC affiliate WFAA.
As far as Jorgensen knew, she said, school policy mandated that males spank males and females spank females.
She said her daughter’s buttocks were red and appeared blistered due to the force of the spanking.
The district’s superintendent told ABC News that administrators followed Texas law.
“The Texas Education Code and our local policies state that if a parent or guardian does not want corporal punishment administered to his/her child, for each school year the parent or guardian must provide the district a separate written and signed statement to that effect. Otherwise, the use of corporal punishment is permissible,” Mike Kelley, superintendent for the Springtown Independent School District said in a statement.
“In practice, our district goes one step further. It does not administer corporal punishment unless the parent or guardian requests that it be administered,” the statement read. “There has been no deviation from that practice. Any deviation from the district’s policy by district staff will be corrected. “
While paddling in public schools has been outlawed by 31 states, as well as by Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, the Supreme Court ruled in 1977 that it was legal unless it has abolished by local authorities, according to the web site Corpun.com.
It is legal in 19 states. Efforts to ban it in Wyoming, North Carolina, Louisiana and Texas failed. However, in 2011 laws were introduced in both Texas and North Carolina giving parents the right to exempt their students from paddling.
The day after her daughter’s paddling, Jorgensen called the vice principal to complain, but was told it was “normal for her bottom to look like this after receiving swats.” The vice principal added that he had no idea about the same gender swatting, Jorgensen said.
But according to the school’s own policy, spanking of a student can only be done by an employee of the same gender.
Another student, Jada Watt, said she mouthed off to the same male vice principal, and received the same punishment, which was observed by a male police officer.
Her mother, Cathi, said she “wasn’t expecting a bruise.”
Springtown ISD Superintendent Mike Kelley told WFAA that he will ask the board to eliminate the requirement of same gender spanking.
He said the same-sex spanking policy can be difficult to observe in smaller schools where aren’t enough female administrators around to mete out punishment to female students.
Watt and Jorgensen object to any policy change. They don’t believe men should hit women under any circumstances.
Notice that the parents state that grown adult men performing a sexually laden act upon young girls is “creepy”.
Perhaps we can contrast this behavior with the sexual abuse covered up for decades at another well-known school, Penn State. Or, maybe we can compare the school districts’ comments to those recently uttered by a man affiliated with the Catholic Church who seemed to think even the first instance of child abuse should be forgiven, because children can be “seducers.”
A Catholic newspaper has removed an interview from their website in which a priest said that pedophiles are seduced by children in “a lot of the cases” and the abusers should not go to jail.
During an interview with National Catholic Register, 78-year-old Father Benedict Groeschel was asked about his experience working with priests involved in abuse.
“People have this picture in their minds of a person planning to — a psychopath. But that’s not the case,” Groeschel explained. “Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer.”
“Well, it’s not so hard to see — a kid looking for a father and didn’t have his own — and they won’t be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping but not having intercourse or anything like that,” he continued.
Groeschel called the abuse “an understandable thing,” and pointed to Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky, who he called a “poor guy.”
So, is Texas a whole lot different than the community who supported the Penn State scandal for years? Are these so-called men principals or pedophiles? In my book, any time a person’s genitals are injured, especially with an intent to commit harm, abuse has occurred, and the fact that these grown men are getting together to injure young girls’ genitals with any object, be it a paddle or penis, or anything, there is sexual abuse happening.